Adriana N. asked:
The world has become a smaller place thanks to the Internet. We cannot imagine a day without browsing the net. If for nothing, we at least visit some of our favorite sites, read some tweets or write remarks on others wall. But not so long back in the past, the Internet was not so complicated. It was just about browsing sites and reading information. So what has changed between now and then, well the technology is one for sure. That is the what this web 20 VS web 10 websites argument is all about.
Traditionally, websites were portals of information. If you wanted to learn more about some topic or read news or get any information you opened a website. It was a passive experience with just one way communication. You could of course click on the various links, but they just opened new pages that you could read. It was all about gathering information. This is what the industry today calls as Web1.0 websites.
The more modern trends have been quite different. The social networking sites are some of the most common and popular names in today’s world. The stark difference between these sites and the older web 1.0 sites is that these sites are more interactive. You can not just read information, but you can also post your own information or thoughts there too. It has become a two way communication channel. Some sites like social networking ones have extended it a step further and made it multi way communication or social networking as it is called. This is Web2.0 era and such sites are web2.0 sites.
The other big bang from the Web2.0 technology has been blogs. Now, individuals do not strive to make great looking homepages: that is Web 1.0, but are focusing on getting more traffic on their blogs, that is Web 2.0. With blogs, you can express your views and people comment on them. That is classic Web 2.0 interactive web browsing experience.
When you look at these differences you could find the web 2.0 vs web 1.0 argument to be like a comparison between lectures and conversations. Web 1.0 sites are like lectures, where you listen to a single source. The Web2.0 sites are more like a conversation where you listen and respond too. The difference is subtle but as we all can see, the results are quite different.
The next big change in online viewing has been the introduction of smaller applications and widgets online. You can now get the same information that you saw on a Web1.0 site, but your page is now studded with all these unique ads with animations and videos and all the good stuff. This is what Web2.0 allows you to do online.
After looking at all this, it may seem that there are no Web1.0 sites left, but that is not true. There are still places where the simplicity of Web1.0 works better than the flashy Web2.0. Company websites giving information to readers about the company is a classic example of this. Unless, they want users to interact on their website, the company homepages can be simple Web1.0 sites.
This is what the entire web 20 VS web 10 websites argument is all about. Both are different ways of engaging users online. One is more passive and other is more interactive.
Web 2.0
The world has become a smaller place thanks to the Internet. We cannot imagine a day without browsing the net. If for nothing, we at least visit some of our favorite sites, read some tweets or write remarks on others wall. But not so long back in the past, the Internet was not so complicated. It was just about browsing sites and reading information. So what has changed between now and then, well the technology is one for sure. That is the what this web 20 VS web 10 websites argument is all about.
Traditionally, websites were portals of information. If you wanted to learn more about some topic or read news or get any information you opened a website. It was a passive experience with just one way communication. You could of course click on the various links, but they just opened new pages that you could read. It was all about gathering information. This is what the industry today calls as Web1.0 websites.
The more modern trends have been quite different. The social networking sites are some of the most common and popular names in today’s world. The stark difference between these sites and the older web 1.0 sites is that these sites are more interactive. You can not just read information, but you can also post your own information or thoughts there too. It has become a two way communication channel. Some sites like social networking ones have extended it a step further and made it multi way communication or social networking as it is called. This is Web2.0 era and such sites are web2.0 sites.
The other big bang from the Web2.0 technology has been blogs. Now, individuals do not strive to make great looking homepages: that is Web 1.0, but are focusing on getting more traffic on their blogs, that is Web 2.0. With blogs, you can express your views and people comment on them. That is classic Web 2.0 interactive web browsing experience.
When you look at these differences you could find the web 2.0 vs web 1.0 argument to be like a comparison between lectures and conversations. Web 1.0 sites are like lectures, where you listen to a single source. The Web2.0 sites are more like a conversation where you listen and respond too. The difference is subtle but as we all can see, the results are quite different.
The next big change in online viewing has been the introduction of smaller applications and widgets online. You can now get the same information that you saw on a Web1.0 site, but your page is now studded with all these unique ads with animations and videos and all the good stuff. This is what Web2.0 allows you to do online.
After looking at all this, it may seem that there are no Web1.0 sites left, but that is not true. There are still places where the simplicity of Web1.0 works better than the flashy Web2.0. Company websites giving information to readers about the company is a classic example of this. Unless, they want users to interact on their website, the company homepages can be simple Web1.0 sites.
This is what the entire web 20 VS web 10 websites argument is all about. Both are different ways of engaging users online. One is more passive and other is more interactive.
Web 2.0
