Fortune Magazine stated “financially speaking, Web 2.0 has been a total bust”. Companies like MySpace and Facebook have loyal followers, but the money is not exactly rolling in. MySpace has posted $6 million in revenue for 2008, falling far short of the $5 billion dollar Target for the site. Even Google hasn’t figured out how to make Money with YouTube after paying $1.65 billion for it two years ago.
“Web 2.0″ is a term that tech publisher Tim O’Reilly coined five years ago to describe a new wave of Internet innovation that lets publishers publish and share content. Yet, 2008 was a big disappointment for social media companies, and twitter was the last company to really change the game in 2007. So even though sites have changed the way that we interact with the Web, Web 2.0 has still failed to deliver new ways to cash in over Web 1.0.
So in steps Web 3.0, what makes Web 3.0 different? One way to look at it is Web 3.0 is the box containing semantic Web, which is a box that contains linked data. You could say that Web 3.0 is like a synonym for the semantic Web.
Using the linking ability of Web 3.0 or linked data from the semantic Web is a technique that the Streamline Funnel System headed by Paul Birdsall is planning to use so that they can filter analyze and transform data in a way that’s much easier than developing an advanced algorithm like so many have done in the past.
Hoping to capitalize on the new launch of the Web 3.0, The Streamline Funnel System is hoping to use it to dig through the information overload that is propagated by the Internet, giving them the ability to break the old traditions of just linking one site to another.
They will be developing linked structured data that is more machine-readable carrying the semantic information in a much better format, paving the way for true semantic Web. So even though a linked data format doesn’t create smart data, it will enable it in a way which gives a technology that the Streamline Funnel System has developed to take this unstructured data and structure it to focus their attention on a target groups to market to.
With the Streamline Funnel System, becoming one of the first Internet applications to use web 3.0 to generate a brand-new marketing technique it should be noted, the term Web 3.0 is really an amorphous term that really shouldn’t be used to describe the system that they are using, although it is clear that it is a new way of using structured data and marketing techniques, paving the way for a new semantic Web in the future.
The internet’s become a major mode of communication and business all over the globe. Now, the second generation of web design and development’s finally here, in the form of the Web 2.0 and it has enhanced features like extra security while sharing files and a very good communication system and many more.
The Web 2.0 is a very refined online tool for its users. Although it is complicated, the core concept of web 2.0 is making the web more interactive, user friendly and simple. With the Web 2.0 technology, the users are always in control of the system and more are deeply connected to their applications and even have the chance to own the data. The other rather interesting features of the application include the ability to run an application from your web browser, the ability to change the content on the web and the different values added to the flow and design of the Web 2.0.
Here’re a few facts you might want to know about the Web 2.0:
o Novices should realize that the Web 2.0 makes use of web platforms and resources to give an enhanced feel to online business and marketing management.
o In the contemporary world, internet marketing is made easy thanks to social websites like MySpace, Facebook and LinkedIn as well as Blogger, WordPress and all the other blog sites. PHP forums are included as well in this list. Social media websites like Flickr, Metacafe and YouTube coupled with book-marking websites like Furl and Delicious as well as RSS feeds and viral marketing strategies are included in the interest groups.
o If you’re receptive and if you socialize a lot with people on other networks, the better you’ll be at guiding traffic to your website. Maintaining a list of visitors, marketing partners, appreciating customers and whoever falls under your Web 2.0 network is very important.
o Build a profile for yourself on a social networking site or start a few blog sites and use the resources they offer you. Just share the resources you create and wait till people start book-marking you. Upload and install feed burners as well as RSS feeds on your site to let your customers know what you’re offering him and stay up-to-date. Just try spreading your business out further and the chance of getting towards the target of mastering Web 2.0 marketing.
o Web 2.0 also plays an important role in developing websites and people are proud about having used it to design their website and that’s the reaction most people expect since the Web 2.0 is not only going to make your website look awesome and eye catching but also gives you all the opportunities to add special effects to your website design. It’ll be a sure hit with the visitors!
Now use large fonts on your webpage and highlight those key phrases with even bigger font sizes! If you’re designing a logo, Web 2.0 is what you’re looking for! Large logos for business promotions and can create good notions about the firm in the eyes of others!
Web 2.0 is a buzzword commonly used to embrace diverse and novel processes on the World Wide Web. Even though predominately a marketing term, some of the key imputes colligated with Web 2.0 include the emergence of social networks, two-way communication, various ‘glue’ techniques and substantial multifariousness in content types. Although most of Web 2.0 runs on the same platform as 1.0, there are some key divergences. Our aim is to key out the elementary differences leading to the properties of interest in 2.0 to be characterized.
Web 2.0 enamours a combination of conceptions on the Web in recent years. The accurate definition is subtle and it is hard to categorize with the binary label “Web 1.0″ or “Web 2.0″. But there is an uncluttered separation between a set of extremely popular Web 2.0 sites such as Facebook and YouTube, and the old Web. These separations are seeable when contrived onto a variety of axes, such as technological structural and sociological.
One of the major differences between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0 is that the content creators were very few in Web 1.0 with the sheer majority of users merely served as consumers of content, while any user can be a content generator in Web 2.0 and various technological assistances have been added to increase the potential for content generation.
Another difference between Web 2.0 and Web 1.0 can be based on time. The term “Web 2.0″ was coined around 2004 and many of the first genuine Web 2.0 sites started egressing in late 2003 and early 2004. The websites which have modified a little in structure since the early 2000′s and before may be counted as Web 1.0 (such as IMDB).
A key feature in Web 2.0 is that these sites boost users to expend as much time as possible on their site. They offer strong inducements for increasing stickiness on the site. In Web 1.0 most websites have links to external sites and users can easily follow those links to other sites. The primary reason for this is that most of the Web 1.0 sites incline to cover a single topic and do not necessitate users to log in to access them. On the other hand, Web 2.0 sites encourage intra-site activities, usually requiring users to log in and build links to others on the site.
Web 1.0 sites were for one-way communication while Web 2.0 sites build two-way communication medium. Web 1.0 was autocratic and top-down. On the other hand, Web 2.0 is democratic and bottom-up. Rather than the New York Times 1.0 website stating you what the significant stories of the day were, Digg.com, Buzz and Yahoo.com depicts the stories users have voted the most crucial.
Web 1.0 sites were plainly to be read passively. Web 2.0 sites tempt participation, voting for the content up or down, grading it, remarking on it, and submitting new posts. By 2000, Amazon.com was allowing users to review books but nowadays users can take part in many different ways like create lists of products, write product guides and edit wiki articles (Amapedia). In 2000, Amazon was utilizing its sites to sell products it bought in. With Web 2.0, Amazon now lets you list and sell your own new and old books and products through their website.
Web 1.0 sites were static and seldom gets changed where Web 2.0 sites are dynamic and change hourly or even more frequently, pondering all of those user shares. Web 1.0 sites were closed up sites while Web 2.0 sites are collaborative sites.
Below table highlights the distinguishing features between Web 2.0 and Web 1.0 and compares how things have changed since the web culture has overturned.
